From: Sameer <sameer@soda.berkeley.edu>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 94 00:19:48 PST
To: hfinney@shell.portal.com (Hal)
Subject: Re: REMAIL: standardized remailer syntax
In-Reply-To: <199404030148.RAA10520@jobe.shell.portal.com>
Message-ID: <m0pnNPB-00010yC@infinity.hip.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hal spake:
> 
> > >	Header commands:
> > >	"Anon-To","Request-Remailing-To": strips headers and sends the 
> > >message to the specified recipient.
>  
> I would suggest abandoning one of "Anon-To" or "Request-Remailing-To",
> as they are redundant.  I know above I suggested two redundant ways of
> specifying remailer commands; maybe that should be reduced to one, as well.

	Actually, I prefer the "Anon-Send-To:" and "Anon-Post-To:"
that hh@soda's remailer uses. It makes the news/mail distinction very
clear. Maybe that Anon-Send-To: and Anon-Post-To: should be the
"standard" (as well as their non-Anon counterparts), with Anon-To: and
Request-Remailing-To: retained for backwards compatibility.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a

iQCVAgUBLZ58GXi7eNFdXppdAQFqkwP+JoFYCDTZeYVlf8j+WVmYaluCUw2gIVR0
P85y9wsrX72GgkZV8WQkaoxihSzyJgik/uxSSoxHkB7WhLJZe7nCn/5nW2GkddmB
h0Z+M0usoN8vbk2G8MEzz13DwWGP0i6arL+qbbhUVv/nsJCqPEuYP3HR9ZZUa3+o
XOLKptArwRk=
=JdSn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----