From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com (bill.stewart@pleasantonca.ncr.com +1-510-484-6204)
To: danisch@ira.uka.de
Message Hash: d7d308a627e7818d83ce824af61e5ea4d9d52a6b9f6ee0b688ca342a5866be6b
Message ID: <9404060231.AA23644@anchor.ho.att.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-06 02:32:06 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 5 Apr 94 19:32:06 PDT
From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com (bill.stewart@pleasantonca.ncr.com +1-510-484-6204)
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 94 19:32:06 PDT
To: danisch@ira.uka.de
Subject: Re: PGP mail disabled ???
Message-ID: <9404060231.AA23644@anchor.ho.att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> No, of course they were using the -a option and the
> mail was normal ASCII armoured.
Some of the FIDO and FIDO-like networks have policies against sending
encrypted email. I don't know if this means their operators
actually read the messages that go by, or do pattern-matching
to look for "BEGIN PGP" or whatever, but they at least have that policy.
Return to April 1994
Return to “wcs@anchor.ho.att.com (bill.stewart@pleasantonca.ncr.com +1-510-484-6204)”
1994-04-06 (Tue, 5 Apr 94 19:32:06 PDT) - Re: PGP mail disabled ??? - wcs@anchor.ho.att.com (bill.stewart@pleasantonca.ncr.com +1-510-484-6204)