From: sonny@netcom.com (James Hicks)
To: Isaac.Norby@f217.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Isaac Norby)
Message Hash: e7e20e6cb4abe0d3cc1bcc666761a0e75841a5f35194f045950b991ec0b928ba
Message ID: <199404090144.SAA11220@mail.netcom.com>
Reply To: <10488.2DA5D5B8@shelter.FIDONET.ORG>
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-09 01:43:55 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 8 Apr 94 18:43:55 PDT
From: sonny@netcom.com (James Hicks)
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 94 18:43:55 PDT
To: Isaac.Norby@f217.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Isaac Norby)
Subject: Re: Soda remailer tampering?
In-Reply-To: <10488.2DA5D5B8@shelter.FIDONET.ORG>
Message-ID: <199404090144.SAA11220@mail.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Isaac Norby writes:
> For more information about this anonymous posting service, please send mail
> to hh@soda.berkeley.edu with Subject: remailer-info. Eric Hollander takes
> no responsibility for the contents of this post. Please, don't throw
>
[...deleted stuff...]
> INTERNET: Isaac.Norby@f217.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG
> >>ira shipment of cocaine
> >>explosives detonate
> --------
[...deleted stuff...]
>
> I don't have a sense of humor about this and want an explanation, now.
>
I sent mail to hh@soda.berkeley.edu with Subject: remailer-info. I got some
info back that included:
> = A note about keywords
>
> This remailer inserts keywords into the headers and tailers of all posts and
> remails. These headers contain phrases which would probably trigger
> automated net monitoring programs, rendering them less effective. This
> insertion is completely automatic and certainly does not constitute a
> statement of intent by anyone (especially the remailer operator) to do
> anything.
I think it's the "keywords" that you noticed.
>James<
Return to April 1994
Return to “sonny@netcom.com (James Hicks)”