1994-05-20 - Why PGP 2.5 sucks…

Header Data

From: ER CRAMER <crame001@hio.tem.nhl.nl>
To: cypher <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 0960bdfd02d1986e0536e2e144c97efe2ce60d7ad5fd00ec6ec3f12b67c6be8a
Message ID: <9405200919.AA00432@hio.tem.nhl.nl>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-20 08:24:34 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 20 May 94 01:24:34 PDT

Raw message

From: ER CRAMER <crame001@hio.tem.nhl.nl>
Date: Fri, 20 May 94 01:24:34 PDT
To: cypher <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Why PGP 2.5 sucks...
Message-ID: <9405200919.AA00432@hio.tem.nhl.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


PGP 2.5 really sucks...

Why?
 - You can't use your old secret key. So you have to build a new one.
   Why? I don't know. But PGP 2.5 don't recognize your pass phrase anymore.
   Maybe that new RSA algoritme is easier to crack. So they force everybody
   to create a new key...

 - A new RSA algorithm??? What's wrong with the old one???

 - Why not bigger keys than 1024 bits???

 - Why can't PGP 2.3a read PGP 2.6 messages anymore after 1 september 1994?

The only good thing about 2.5 is that it's legal in de USA and Canada? But
why doesn't someone gets a license for PGP 2.3a so that's a legal version
too! (or is that inpossible???)

... If you outlaw Privacy, only the Outlaws will have Privacy!

Eelco Cramer <crame001@hio.tem.nhl.nl> ------
--------------------------------------------------




Thread