From: ER CRAMER <crame001@hio.tem.nhl.nl>
To: cypher <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 0960bdfd02d1986e0536e2e144c97efe2ce60d7ad5fd00ec6ec3f12b67c6be8a
Message ID: <9405200919.AA00432@hio.tem.nhl.nl>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-20 08:24:34 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 20 May 94 01:24:34 PDT
From: ER CRAMER <crame001@hio.tem.nhl.nl>
Date: Fri, 20 May 94 01:24:34 PDT
To: cypher <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Why PGP 2.5 sucks...
Message-ID: <9405200919.AA00432@hio.tem.nhl.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
PGP 2.5 really sucks...
Why?
- You can't use your old secret key. So you have to build a new one.
Why? I don't know. But PGP 2.5 don't recognize your pass phrase anymore.
Maybe that new RSA algoritme is easier to crack. So they force everybody
to create a new key...
- A new RSA algorithm??? What's wrong with the old one???
- Why not bigger keys than 1024 bits???
- Why can't PGP 2.3a read PGP 2.6 messages anymore after 1 september 1994?
The only good thing about 2.5 is that it's legal in de USA and Canada? But
why doesn't someone gets a license for PGP 2.3a so that's a legal version
too! (or is that inpossible???)
... If you outlaw Privacy, only the Outlaws will have Privacy!
Eelco Cramer <crame001@hio.tem.nhl.nl> ------
--------------------------------------------------
Return to May 1994
Return to “ER CRAMER <crame001@hio.tem.nhl.nl>”