1994-05-13 - Re: Moderation?

Header Data

From: Linn Stanton <lstanton@sten.lehman.com>
To: hendrix@acs.bu.edu (Julian Burke)
Message Hash: 0a2fc4c503c2a48f10b9a740523107cf036e9e00a4bd9c12de9459739342b30f
Message ID: <9405131841.AA04822@sten.lehman.com>
Reply To: <9405131825.AA49030@acs.bu.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-13 18:40:31 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 13 May 94 11:40:31 PDT

Raw message

From: Linn Stanton <lstanton@sten.lehman.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 94 11:40:31 PDT
To: hendrix@acs.bu.edu (Julian Burke)
Subject: Re: Moderation?
In-Reply-To: <9405131825.AA49030@acs.bu.edu>
Message-ID: <9405131841.AA04822@sten.lehman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


In message <9405131825.AA49030@acs.bu.edu>you write:
  > It has its problems, but the benefits are what keep everyone tuned in.
  > I would prefer the occasional reminder that "Cypherpunks write code",
  > to a censor by another name.

I agree. While moderation could help the signal to noise ratio; I think
that the messages not approved should still be posted, just with a standard
indicator suitable for filtering by those who wish too.

Linn H. Stanton <stanton@acm.org>

The above opinions are exclusively my own. If anyone else wants them,
they can buy them from me. Easy terms can be arranged.
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: 2.3a
 
mQBNAitK8+EAAAECALzK83DH79m7DLKBmZA2h9U33fBE80EwT4xRY05K7WRfxpO3
BmhPVBmes9h97odVZ0RxAFvinOl4wZGOb8pDclMABRG0IUxpbm4gSC4gU3RhbnRv
biA8c3RhbnRvbkBhY20ub3JnPokAVQIFEC2u0NyIwD3rAd2buQEB4ggB/R72gmWG
FJACaoxKijfLZYEiyGOZI3xB6oQSOsV4D1EZ1jVn7UV0Orh4hCbm/bcJbacA5qCh
UkfTwFPq1qvM4mC0J0xpbm4gSC4gU3RhbnRvbiA8bHN0YW50b25Ac2hlYXJzb24u
Y29tPg==
=HQq9
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----




Thread