From: Tommy the Tourist <nobody@soda.berkeley.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0ce9305562f7fc4e595f05166a5a27068e75925a151b228df5072b921357f890
Message ID: <199405141625.JAA21754@soda.berkeley.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-14 16:25:30 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 14 May 94 09:25:30 PDT
From: Tommy the Tourist <nobody@soda.berkeley.edu>
Date: Sat, 14 May 94 09:25:30 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: possible anti-mandatory-clipper constitutional angle?
Message-ID: <199405141625.JAA21754@soda.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
From: Ezekial Palmer <an60011@anon.penet.fi>
Date: Sat May 14 12:15:04 EDT 1994
Date: Sat, 14 May 1994 11:40:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: "R. David Murray" <rdmurray@keene.edu>
Subject: possible anti-mandatory-clipper constitutional angle?
A government mandante for key-escrow encryption in all
communication devices would be the information-age equivalent of
the government requiring private citizens to quarter troups in
their home.
While I agree with you as to the analogy, a big part of me says "so
what?". A major court decision or constitutional amendment that
effectively says that electronic info is equivalent to info on paper
would go a long way toward rationalizing the situation, but basically
there's almost no precedent at all for saying that any civil liberties
are protected in the electronic realm and there's a reasonable amount
of precedent in the other direction.
I suspect that you'd have a lot of trouble convincing the
technologically ignorant that something electronic could be at all
like quartering troops in your home.
A big problem in general is that "the information-age equivalent"
isn't something that most people can (or choose to) see.
Zeke
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a
iQCVAgUBLdT5ORVg/9j67wWxAQHhEgP9ENyQ6zAVKst8NhpVxGd5CCBlmVWnNg4L
m9HI06Z5rOpbawvSMjkBdKXJGKu5ObKrNqrHP6N9s2ZhvDd2Q7gPdMbm9mXHpf7w
/uqsVE1a9bHob7F9FDVkz438a4bP8WaEHyZWOdpmvZ+bB7L1ELhuVWyT12vOy61h
vfTBj9B1sN4=
=VNuc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------
To respond to the sender of this message, send mail to
remailer@soda.berkeley.edu, starting your message with
the following 7 lines:
::
Response-Key: ideaclipper
====Encrypted-Sender-Begin====
MI@```$]S^P;+]AB?X9TW6\8WR:^P&2':U$*B?=.'X1J!JJA1M.D\ME8M'?MH
GS670];'$("C3!.=DH.!6L_>ISX4,5U)O?EU><HU9BY?VZ!&Q3XH=
====Encrypted-Sender-End====
Return to May 1994
Return to “Tommy the Tourist <nobody@soda.berkeley.edu>”
1994-05-14 (Sat, 14 May 94 09:25:30 PDT) - Re: possible anti-mandatory-clipper constitutional angle? - Tommy the Tourist <nobody@soda.berkeley.edu>