1994-05-07 - Re: Putting new PGP on company machines.

Header Data

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
To: smb@research.att.com
Message Hash: 12a50ec80009efa0b998615493836bc358689d8005b9607c6229d1e51e36108c
Message ID: <Pine.3.87.9405061735.A3918-0100000@crl2.crl.com>
Reply To: <9405062349.AA16716@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-07 00:16:52 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 6 May 94 17:16:52 PDT

Raw message

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Date: Fri, 6 May 94 17:16:52 PDT
To: smb@research.att.com
Subject: Re: Putting new PGP on company machines.
In-Reply-To: <9405062349.AA16716@toad.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.87.9405061735.A3918-0100000@crl2.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


C'punks,

With regard to the thread about:

>> Has anyone asked the company shysters about the legal status of MIT-PGP?

Remember, it is easier to get forgiveness than permission.


 S a n d y

Thread

• Return to May 1994

• Return to “Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>”

• Return to “smb@research.att.com”

• 1994-05-06 (Fri, 6 May 94 16:49:42 PDT) - Re: Putting new PGP on company machines. - smb@research.att.com
  • 1994-05-07 (Fri, 6 May 94 17:16:52 PDT) - Re: Putting new PGP on company machines. - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>