1994-05-06 - Re: Putting new PGP on company machines.

Header Data

From: paul@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com (Paul Ferguson)
To: andy@autodesk.com (Andrew Purshottam)
Message Hash: 16b74353a2d6a0dff2372c63f5a98783e9b8600b1acce133af790581de597b9f
Message ID: <9405062358.AA11428@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com>
Reply To: <199405062158.OAA29578@meefun.autodesk.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-06 22:58:03 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 6 May 94 15:58:03 PDT

Raw message

From: paul@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com (Paul Ferguson)
Date: Fri, 6 May 94 15:58:03 PDT
To: andy@autodesk.com (Andrew Purshottam)
Subject: Re: Putting new PGP on company machines.
In-Reply-To: <199405062158.OAA29578@meefun.autodesk.com>
Message-ID: <9405062358.AA11428@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text



> 
> Has anyone asked the company shysters about the legal status of MIT-PGP?
> I'd really like to have and use pgp at work, but have hesitated about
> putting it our machines here, as we are so prim and proper (in public)
> about intellectual property.
>

Anonymous (nowhere@bsu-cs.bsu.edu) asked a good question earlier -- one 
which I have not seen an answer. Personally, I'd like to know the
same thing, and that is, can someone shed some light on this rumored
version of PGP 2.5 (MIT-PGP?)?

- paul

Thread

• Return to May 1994

• Return to “Andrew Purshottam <andy@autodesk.com>”
• Return to “Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>”

• Return to “paul@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com (Paul Ferguson)”

• 1994-05-06 (Fri, 6 May 94 15:18:14 PDT) - Putting new PGP on company machines. - Andrew Purshottam <andy@autodesk.com>
  • 1994-05-06 (Fri, 6 May 94 15:50:43 PDT) - Re: Putting new PGP on company machines. - Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
    • 1994-05-06 (Fri, 6 May 94 16:43:21 PDT) - Re: Putting new PGP on company machines. - Andrew Purshottam <andy@autodesk.com>
  • 1994-05-06 (Fri, 6 May 94 15:58:03 PDT) - Re: Putting new PGP on company machines. - paul@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com (Paul Ferguson)