From: “Jim Sewell” <jims@Central.KeyWest.MPGN.COM>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 3f218c82512e38318f466ce90f6937a13f294edaa62a1c6f126a63497ff4ff2a
Message ID: <9405311523.AA17424@Central.KeyWest.MPGN.COM>
Reply To: <199405272154.AA05325@access1.digex.net>
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-31 15:23:51 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 31 May 94 08:23:51 PDT
From: "Jim Sewell" <jims@Central.KeyWest.MPGN.COM>
Date: Tue, 31 May 94 08:23:51 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Lawsuit
In-Reply-To: <199405272154.AA05325@access1.digex.net>
Message-ID: <9405311523.AA17424@Central.KeyWest.MPGN.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
<In mail Black Unicorn said:>
>
> Timothy C. May scripsit
> >
> > I'd say you have some sleazy friends, then. For them to fax off copies
> > of what they think of as rants is bad enough, but for one of your
> > contacts to then "alert" the others is mind-boggling.
>
> The context was blurred with each successive forwarding.
> I might add that as the forwarding went on, it ventured farther into the
> "business associate" types, and much farther from the "friend" catagory.
If the context was blurred by each of the people in the chain of friends
and associates of yours before the 'uptight business associates' saw it
then aren't they as responsible for you defamation as tmp is?
Not an attack... I personally agree that lawsuits are acceptable in the
right circumstance... merely an observation.
Jim
--
Tantalus Inc. Jim Sewell Amateur Radio: KD4CKQ
P.O. Box 2310 Programmer Internet: jims@mpgn.com
Key West, FL 33045 C-Unix-PC Compu$erve: 71061,1027
(305)293-8100 PGP via email on request.
1K-bit Fingerprint: 8E 14 68 90 37 87 EF B3 C4 CF CD 9A 3E F9 4A 73
Return to May 1994
Return to “tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)”