From: John K Clark <johnkc@well.sf.ca.us>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 444273d7dff1ca56c1600b2aefe3c947fc689ba88a32079852db9bcb5fda1f2c
Message ID: <199405160356.UAA21899@well.sf.ca.us>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-16 03:57:10 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 15 May 94 20:57:10 PDT
From: John K Clark <johnkc@well.sf.ca.us>
Date: Sun, 15 May 94 20:57:10 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Quantum Computers and stuff
Message-ID: <199405160356.UAA21899@well.sf.ca.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I found this in the May 6 issue of Science:
>At the same press conference where Lenstra and company announced
>the defeat of RSA-129,he promised a "surprise" for the next
>factoring feat. He hinted at a new, faster algorithm- and
>perhaps a test involving a number with quite a few more digits
>than 129.
Then I found this in the May 7 issue of Science News:
>In a startling theoretical result that could call into question
>any cryptosystem based on factoring, Peter W Shore of AT&T Bell
>Laboratories in Murray Hill, N.J., has just proved that
>factoring is "easy" when done on a special type of computer
>operating according to quantum mechanical principles . Although
>such a quantum computer does not yet exist, this finding has
>shaken the cryptographic community.
By "easy" I presume they mean solvable in Polynomical time. I'm
not saying the writing is on the wall or anything but it might
be prudent to start thinking about Diffe-Hellman, perhaps using
elliptic curves.
John K Clark johnkc@well.sf.ca.us
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a
iQCzAgUBLdbskn03wfSpid95AQFZuwTvVug954sJilmhlyR3Sye+LpCB9ktG+erw
mfDHBbAUpYC34P/lL81dzekGj7hmMhOIgZklZn7h/XfgCydQihm0e+DHGC9h64nT
AI6g2xHI5k/hH9QZRUPjFLwreaFeKX4ARy3rfWEgpGC7g1qqyPnKQi7TBuffyYCV
51NJ9lGzGjuSVIcDdHcGBIoTkMg1T8pH+Yr44jo/MehE86KB+/0=
=pxVR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to May 1994
Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>”