From: rishab@dxm.ernet.in
To: ecarp@netcom.com
Message Hash: 4bc5ca579d545f65245117fb6a6dc17f89c4eee69938024364b237580108cee2
Message ID: <gate.2wocmc1w165w@dxm.ernet.in>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-14 19:57:07 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 14 May 94 12:57:07 PDT
From: rishab@dxm.ernet.in
Date: Sat, 14 May 94 12:57:07 PDT
To: ecarp@netcom.com
Subject: Auto moderation
Message-ID: <gate.2wocmc1w165w@dxm.ernet.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
ecarp@netcom.com (Ed Carp):
> [ auto moderators ]
> > Sounds like a very easy scheme to break. Say I suddenly decide that I
> > don't like your posts or Tim Mays posts. I can get you kicked off by
> > using anonymous accounts to say that you're a nuisance. It seems to me
>
> It's not as easy as you might think. How many anonymous accounts can you get?
> There are only so many anon servers, and for each anon account you have to have
> a different real account, all it buys you is your vote registers twice
Do you know how easy it is to fake an address? I occasionally telnet to port 25
and talk SMTP directly, to avoid spooling, but I have to type in the address
I want the mail to appear from. There's no way of ensuring that I type in
my real address, or _any_ real address at all for that matter.
Digitally signed voting? Only works if you restrict yourself to 'known' voters.
Net identities are very easy to fake or create.
> Ed Carp, N7EKG/VE3 ecarp@netcom.com 519/824-3307
> Finger ecarp@netcom.com for PGP 2.3a public key an88744@anon.penet.fi
That's an _anonymous_ address, right !? -----------------^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rishab Aiyer Ghosh rishab@dxm.ernet.in
Voicemail +91 11 3760335; Vox/Fax/Data 6853410
H-34C Saket New Delhi 110017 INDIA
The National Short-Sleeved Shirt Association says:
Support your right to bare arms!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return to May 1994
Return to “rishab@dxm.ernet.in (Rishab Aiyer Ghosh)”