1994-05-30 - Re: “lifeguard(?)”: bullet tracking system???

Header Data

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
To: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
Message Hash: 561cdb2c6588628f98da7568de00f7f995b81f28778aa37b43091490667b0800
Message ID: <Pine.3.87.9405291522.A20297-0100000@crl.crl.com>
Reply To: <199405292202.SAA05375@zork.tiac.net>
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-30 02:26:37 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 29 May 94 19:26:37 PDT

Raw message

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Date: Sun, 29 May 94 19:26:37 PDT
To: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
Subject: Re: "lifeguard(?)": bullet tracking system???
In-Reply-To: <199405292202.SAA05375@zork.tiac.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.87.9405291522.A20297-0100000@crl.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


C'punks,

On Sun, 29 May 1994, Robert Hettinga wrote:

> . . .
> [snip]
> and Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com> replied,
> 
> [much really spiffy stuff about shooting the shooter(or not) "elided" as
> they say around here...]
> 
> 
> 
> uh, is this *really* cryptography?
> 
> [sorry...]

No need to apologize, Robert.  We all make mistakes.

Well, it is about privacy (all those microphones wouldn't have to just
listen for gunshots) and about empowering the police state.  As I see it,
Cypherpunks aren't primarily interested in crypto as an end, but rather as
a means to an end.  I'll leave the determination of what end(s) we have 
in mind.  Probably, though, they would strongly overlap with concern about 
a police state with ubiquitous microphones, and (doG forbid) automated 
machine guns.

Think about it.


 S a n d y
 






Thread