1994-05-26 - Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?

Header Data

From: lile@netcom.com (Lile Elam)
To: perry@imsi.com
Message Hash: 5645a2265fd52501a7c22198e8b1c1a3f48d499d8e570a75246a7bdc210ff7f8
Message ID: <199405261909.MAA18622@netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-26 19:09:43 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 26 May 94 12:09:43 PDT

Raw message

From: lile@netcom.com (Lile Elam)
Date: Thu, 26 May 94 12:09:43 PDT
To: perry@imsi.com
Subject: Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?
Message-ID: <199405261909.MAA18622@netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>Russell Nelson says:
>>    Date: Wed, 25 May 94 10:25:30 -0700
>>    From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
>> 
>>       You have to assume that RSA isn't being run by idiots.  Either they're
>>       looking at closing their doors in seven years, or they've got a plan.
>> 
>>    I asked Jim Bidzos about this last year.  He told me they're planning
>>    on becoming a supplier of cryptography code and expertise.
>> 
>> If they had expertise, they wouldn't need patents.
>
>Make no mistake, they have expertise. As much as we like to denegrate
>them, they are responsible for several algorithms we all use every
>day, like MD5.
>
>That said, I agree that the patents are unsavory. However, none of us
>thus far have shown the testicular fortitude to challenge any of them.
>
>Perry
>


Such software patents really need to be challenged, If you are interested
in helping, please contact the LPF (League for Programming Freedom). 

I'll send their addr shortly....

By the way, I re-subscribed myself to this list last night. Thanks for all
the great notes. :)

-lile


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lile Elam	    |  "Remember... No matter where you go, there you are."
lile@netcom.com     |		
Un*x Admin / Artist |			 Buckaroo Banzai
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~







Thread