From: bshantz@spry.com (Brad Shantz)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 587b7ee9b100c30f3968f0f1e8ed0c96d66b22f40ca0865d9dcd844b5b2467d7
Message ID: <9405251619.AA23090@homer.spry.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-25 16:19:10 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 25 May 94 09:19:10 PDT
From: bshantz@spry.com (Brad Shantz)
Date: Wed, 25 May 94 09:19:10 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Graph isomorphism based PK cryptosystems?
Message-ID: <9405251619.AA23090@homer.spry.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>Harry Bartholomew says:
> > > Jay Prime Positive says:
> > > > I only worry that if I publish, it could be patented. And I don't
> > > > want the algorithm to end up in the hands of the software patent
> > > > folks. Especially if they will be making money off it, and I wont.
> > >
> > > If you publish, only you could patent it. There is only danger if you
> > > don't publish, in which case others can independently make the same
> > > discovery and patent it.
> > >
> > > Perry
> >
> > But you would then need to file within one year of the publication
> > date I think.
>
> His whole point was that he wanted to render the process unpatentable.
>
> Perry
So, if JPP publishes it, it would be a matter of trust that he wouldn't patent
it. Okay, I have no problems with that. However, it is still patentable.
What could be done to make it unpatentable?
Brad
:::::::::::::::::<<< NETWORKING THE DESKTOP >>>:::::::::::::::::
Brad Shantz Internet : bshantz@spry.com
SPRY Inc Ph# (206) 447-0300
316 Occidental Avenue S. 2nd Floor FAX (206) 447-9008
Seattle, WA 98104
----------------------------------------------------------------
"In gopherspace no one can hear you scream."
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Return to May 1994
Return to “hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)”