From: danisch@ira.uka.de (Hadmut Danisch)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 5ae29f9015bb2cb067989fe0d69a00b7456dfa836ddb473cca37cac4ea1b2d3b
Message ID: <9405192304.AA12189@deathstar.iaks.ira.uka.de>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-19 23:04:49 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 19 May 94 16:04:49 PDT
From: danisch@ira.uka.de (Hadmut Danisch)
Date: Thu, 19 May 94 16:04:49 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Is pgp 2.5 insecure?
Message-ID: <9405192304.AA12189@deathstar.iaks.ira.uka.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hi,
I was looking for a pgp public key
and got a message of a key server. It will be down until
pgp 2.5 is available and then it will not accept any keys
generated by a pgp lower than 2.4.
What is the reason for this? I thought the only difference
was the use of the rsaref code. There should not any difference
in the key structure. Is this the way to introduce a clipper-pgp and
make people use it?
pgp 2.5 will not be available outside USA. Where can I get a
description of the diffs of the logical functions? Perhaps I will
write a copy of this program using our local toolbox, and make
it available outside the USA.
Hadmut
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a
iQCVAgUBLdvwa2c1jG5vDiNxAQGuZQP7B1FH6SQAfpQ+7h3pHJOAhgV2z3bE3a8A
AQNdWPnNhDeky2eQEOuqi22+xFfqc2l3fGAmQnwydRtK89LvQDoFvQngWpeLIbpz
Lj54PVLGjiZesJ7NV7BYGgG8rlIWSxhH22R9W4f/xWrgpLrUQ25IsomXaCsU7B+j
j9+mrxBm0D0=
=n4JA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to May 1994
Return to “danisch@ira.uka.de (Hadmut Danisch)”
1994-05-19 (Thu, 19 May 94 16:04:49 PDT) - Is pgp 2.5 insecure? - danisch@ira.uka.de (Hadmut Danisch)