From: ABROUARD@antioc.antioch.edu
To: peb@netcom.com
Message Hash: 6abfaa2d7d2b7b4eb034c9604a20465417307f0155385577881dabd4829d80a1
Message ID: <01HC6F5FY0N6000EAB@antioc.antioch.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-10 19:01:27 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 10 May 94 12:01:27 PDT
From: ABROUARD@antioc.antioch.edu
Date: Tue, 10 May 94 12:01:27 PDT
To: peb@netcom.com
Subject: Re: NYT op-ed May 8
Message-ID: <01HC6F5FY0N6000EAB@antioc.antioch.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
David Gelertner's NYT op ed piece seemed to suggest that the government
would gain no new information if the digital telephony bill is passed.
Quite obviously the ability to automatically scan for what one is interested
in would be a tremendous boon to various agencies info gathering projects.
Even Gelernter must realize how hollow his reasoning sounds.
It makes one wonder what sort of critical thinking they're teaching at Yale
these days - or perhaps in whose pocket he's comfortably ensconsed.
Andrew Brouard
abrouard@chaos.antioch.edu
Return to May 1994
Return to “ABROUARD@antioc.antioch.edu”
1994-05-10 (Tue, 10 May 94 12:01:27 PDT) - Re: NYT op-ed May 8 - ABROUARD@antioc.antioch.edu