From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 794ae39589cf2417e605e5deab0290dfebebecafc25e195f481421f6cf7f9f4f
Message ID: <9405031733.AA28937@ah.com>
Reply To: <9405031416.AA24171@acs5.acs.ucalgary.ca>
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-03 17:57:46 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 3 May 94 10:57:46 PDT
From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
Date: Tue, 3 May 94 10:57:46 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: The American money capture
In-Reply-To: <9405031416.AA24171@acs5.acs.ucalgary.ca>
Message-ID: <9405031733.AA28937@ah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>The trust issue is fungible. If you trust Yankee greenbacks, and
>my receipts rank pari-pasu, with them, then you trust my
>receipts.
Not completely fungible. There is also trust in the trustee as a
trustee, who could abscond with the whole sum suddenly.
This point is extremely important. The difference between "your
receipts" and someone else's means that you don't have a completely
fungible system.
>No reserve is necessary, because I don't make loans.
It appears that you have 100% reserves, from the phrase _pari pasu_.
Eric
Return to May 1994
Return to “NetSurfer <jdwilson@gold.chem.hawaii.edu>”