From: jpp@jpplap.markv.com (Jay Prime Positive)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 82e278c56b530bb2b6b21cbff7ec4d63f4368ee894018a9965ac128eee825a99
Message ID: <m0q7G9i-0003paC@jpplap>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-28 05:38:52 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 27 May 94 22:38:52 PDT
From: jpp@jpplap.markv.com (Jay Prime Positive)
Date: Fri, 27 May 94 22:38:52 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: (fwd) Re: NSA Helped Yeltsin Foil 1991 Coup
Message-ID: <m0q7G9i-0003paC@jpplap>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Fri, 27 May 94 18:54 PDT
From: jpp@jpplap.markv.com (Jay Prime Positive)
Infact, the birthday paradox just about garantees
that the number is less than E1*E2*E3.
After thinking about it some more, I think I would like to rephrase
that. I don't think 2^k is nearly close enough to ((2^k)!)^(1/2) for
me to say 'garantee'. But, it is possible for E1*E2*E3 to excede the
number of permutations of the e1( e2( e3( x ))) system.
j(no i am not a tmp tenticle)'
Return to May 1994
Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>”