From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
To: “Paul E. Baclace” <peb@netcom.com>
Message Hash: 8786e294aefd7945bbc83ff4c2a845805cde8fd2d2d4af6aa78aa24bb48ee25c
Message ID: <Pine.3.05.9405101449.A28954-a100000@panix.com>
Reply To: <199405101816.LAA29969@netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-10 18:30:03 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 10 May 94 11:30:03 PDT
From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 94 11:30:03 PDT
To: "Paul E. Baclace" <peb@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: NYT op-ed May 8
In-Reply-To: <199405101816.LAA29969@netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.05.9405101449.A28954-a100000@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Tue, 10 May 1994, Paul E. Baclace wrote:
> I just tuned-in last night...Has anyone discussed the NYT op-ed by
> David Gelernter (associate prof. at Yale)? It was accompanied by a
> comic "the first wiretap" and Gelernter says common sense dictates
> that wiretaps be preserved and he wants the digital telephony bill
> passed.
>
> Paul E. Baclace
> peb@netcom.com
I sent a message on same into the void on Sunday. If anyone has it, I
would appreciate it if they would repost it (I was unsubscribed to the
list at the time.)
This op-ed piece represents the strongest independent attack on our
position. Someone should grab it from Nexis and post it. It has to be
answered.
DCF
Return to May 1994
Return to “peb@netcom.com (Paul E. Baclace)”