1994-05-06 - Anybody else see eye-to-eye with Connie Chung tonight?

Header Data

From: rjc@gnu.ai.mit.edu
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 896f04f6e0f6de1b5b23a7283914dcb10227d2e8d2ed0c5f3cb63c26f5b18b8e
Message ID: <9405060231.AA19359@sugar-bombs.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-06 02:31:55 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 5 May 94 19:31:55 PDT

Raw message

From: rjc@gnu.ai.mit.edu
Date: Thu, 5 May 94 19:31:55 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Anybody else see eye-to-eye with Connie Chung tonight?
Message-ID: <9405060231.AA19359@sugar-bombs.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



  They had a segment on a "digital stalker" on Prodigy. Basically,
a guy who kept getting anonymous Prodigy accounts with fake
credit cards and then used the accounts to harass people almost
like Detweiler.  The reporter's attitude was disturbing however.
His attitude almost seemed to be that Prodigy should read each and
every private message to protect users from harassment. The whole
segment is a foreshadow of how society will react when anonymous
remailing becomes widespread.

  One more thing. The narrator seemed to imply that what we know
as "flaming" should be controlled. For instance, the phrase
"check your thorazine dosage" could be viewed as digital harrasment.
It's a brave new world out there. Coming to your local cyberspace
soon.

-ray










Thread