1994-05-07 - Re: Anonymous?
Header Data
From: prock@teetot.acusd.edu (no depression)
To: ebrandt@jarthur.cs.hmc.edu
Message Hash: 8c4995842ef88348aeb5b5a2271f192ef13e35e13f2ec54249893de35c607c1b
Message ID: <9405070823.AA07893@teetot.acusd.edu>
Reply To: <9405070108.AA17959@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-07 08:24:08 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 7 May 94 01:24:08 PDT
Raw message
From: prock@teetot.acusd.edu (no depression)
Date: Sat, 7 May 94 01:24:08 PDT
To: ebrandt@jarthur.cs.hmc.edu
Subject: Re: Anonymous?
In-Reply-To: <9405070108.AA17959@toad.com>
Message-ID: <9405070823.AA07893@teetot.acusd.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
[rather clever way of using peoples sigs to
map anonymous users to their real logins deleted]
I will take this to be the final affirmation that
.sig files are one of the worst ideas on the network.
I do not use them and sign each piece of mail personally.
Of course this is oft times automatic, but hey maybe now
I'll quit that entirly now.
Thread
Return to May 1994
- Return to “nobody@jarthur.cs.hmc.edu”
Return to “prock@teetot.acusd.edu (no depression)”
- 1994-05-07 (Fri, 6 May 94 18:09:05 PDT) - Anonymous? - nobody@jarthur.cs.hmc.edu
- 1994-05-07 (Sat, 7 May 94 01:24:08 PDT) - Re: Anonymous? - prock@teetot.acusd.edu (no depression)