1994-05-10 - Re: Clipper on Science Friday
Header Data
From: habs@warwick.com (Harry S. Hawk)
To: karn@qualcomm.com (Phil Karn)
Message Hash: 909a2bbeba40216cc503c8e1eacde6436856c4590ea921ae88a32450ae16a726
Message ID: <9405101752.AA11724@cmyk.warwick.com>
Reply To: <199405062104.OAA10965@servo.qualcomm.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-10 15:01:44 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 10 May 94 08:01:44 PDT
Raw message
From: habs@warwick.com (Harry S. Hawk)
Date: Tue, 10 May 94 08:01:44 PDT
To: karn@qualcomm.com (Phil Karn)
Subject: Re: Clipper on Science Friday
In-Reply-To: <199405062104.OAA10965@servo.qualcomm.com>
Message-ID: <9405101752.AA11724@cmyk.warwick.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> (used in PGP) in the same way she had reviewed Skipjack. She said she
> could not because her review of Skipjack consisted mostly of reviewing
> the work NSA had already done, and similar information was not available
> for IDEA.
So much for "an independent review ..."
/hawk
Thread
Return to May 1994
- Return to “habs@warwick.com (Harry S. Hawk)”
Return to “Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>”
- 1994-05-06 (Fri, 6 May 94 14:04:54 PDT) - Clipper on Science Friday - Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>
- 1994-05-10 (Tue, 10 May 94 08:01:44 PDT) - Re: Clipper on Science Friday - habs@warwick.com (Harry S. Hawk)