From: fnerd@smds.com (FutureNerd Steve Witham)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 94bdb53d36c1776dd33bbdfe6ac655d06b236a2739e6e3b7f1e716fff886242b
Message ID: <9405311917.AA13956@smds.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-31 19:27:25 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 31 May 94 12:27:25 PDT
From: fnerd@smds.com (FutureNerd Steve Witham)
Date: Tue, 31 May 94 12:27:25 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: I back your scratch...
Message-ID: <9405311917.AA13956@smds.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
So, the reason I asked about "orthogonal checksums" was this:
If you can check the integrity of a copy of a file remotely, then
people can trade storage space and have remote backups. Or have
more complicated schemes where, say, a group of users pay for a
common storage service by backing up some of the files (or other
files) for the provider.
The nice thing about this is that storage space is something that's
immediately valuable and electronically tradable. And its value
can increase by trading. In other words, we can trade one meg for
one meg and both come out ahead in terms of safety. "I back your
scratch and you back mine."
I'm not sure storage space makes a good unit of value for anything
else, since the cost of storage keeps going down. On the other
hand, trading space for space is immune to that inflation.
Some concrete applications:
o Making bulletin boards' data safe from loss by vandalism
o Archiving a mailing list
-fnerd
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
nowhere man has gone before
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a
aKxB8nktcBAeQHabQP/d7yhWgpGZBIoIqII8cY9nG55HYHgvt3niQCVAgUBLMs3K
ui6XaCZmKH68fOWYYySKAzPkXyfYKnOlzsIjp2tPEot1Q5A3/n54PBKrUDN9tHVz
3Ch466q9EKUuDulTU6OLsilzmRvQJn0EJhzd4pht6hSnC1R3seYNhUYhoJViCcCG
sRjLQs4iVVM=
=9wqs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to May 1994
Return to “fnerd@smds.com (FutureNerd Steve Witham)”
1994-05-31 (Tue, 31 May 94 12:27:25 PDT) - I back your scratch… - fnerd@smds.com (FutureNerd Steve Witham)