1994-05-27 - Malformed Signatures?
Header Data
From: paul@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com (Paul Ferguson)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a7d2257d09ddc990b9b608c23cd34e39da113da2310431e6ff1f7a80cb24b028
Message ID: <9405270230.AA05721@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-27 01:28:03 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 26 May 94 18:28:03 PDT
Raw message
From: paul@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com (Paul Ferguson)
Date: Thu, 26 May 94 18:28:03 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Malformed Signatures?
Message-ID: <9405270230.AA05721@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Reason Number 7 why I knew i wouldn't cozy to PGP 2.6 -
After tinkering around, I decided to see what would happen if I
implemented PGP 2.6 using my existing 2.3a keyrings. After performimg
a "pgp -kc paul" PGP 2.6 declares my signatories:
(Malformed or obsolete signature format)
and asks if I would like it to:
Remove bad signatures (Y/n)?
Does this mean what I think it means?
- paul
just a tad miffed
Thread
Return to May 1994
- Return to “Alan Barrett <barrett@daisy.ee.und.ac.za>”
- Return to “Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>”
Return to “paul@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com (Paul Ferguson)”
- 1994-05-27 (Thu, 26 May 94 18:28:03 PDT) - Malformed Signatures? - paul@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com (Paul Ferguson)
- 1994-05-27 (Thu, 26 May 94 19:36:32 PDT) - Re: Malformed Signatures? - Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
- 1994-05-27 (Fri, 27 May 94 00:02:19 PDT) - Re: Malformed Signatures? - Alan Barrett <barrett@daisy.ee.und.ac.za>