1994-05-16 - Re: PGP 2.5 Beta Release Over, PGP 2.6 to be released next week
Header Data
From: “Robert A. Hayden” <hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
To: “Jeffrey I. Schiller” <jis@mit.edu>
Message Hash: ae9f86dcc22a4dabb00e49d9a3c08d2698e1789f3e1802e2f78d19a5feebb5bc
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9405161324.A3964-0100000@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
Reply To: <9405161804.AA08573@big-screw>
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-16 18:17:39 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 16 May 94 11:17:39 PDT
Raw message
From: "Robert A. Hayden" <hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
Date: Mon, 16 May 94 11:17:39 PDT
To: "Jeffrey I. Schiller" <jis@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: PGP 2.5 Beta Release Over, PGP 2.6 to be released next week
In-Reply-To: <9405161804.AA08573@big-screw>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9405161324.A3964-0100000@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Mon, 16 May 1994, Jeffrey I. Schiller wrote:
> MIT encourages all non-commercial users in the U.S. to upgrade
> to PGP 2.6, and all keyserver operators to no longer accept keys that
> are identified as being produced by PGP 2.3.
But how SAFE is MIT-PGP 2.6? I've yet to read any independent reviews of
it.
____ Robert A. Hayden <=> hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu
\ /__ -=-=-=-=- <=> -=-=-=-=-
\/ / Finger for Geek Code Info <=> Political Correctness is
\/ Finger for PGP 2.3a Public Key <=> P.C. for "Thought Police"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
(GEEK CODE 1.0.1) GAT d- -p+(---) c++(++++) l++ u++ e+/* m++(*)@ s-/++
n-(---) h+(*) f+ g+ w++ t++ r++ y+(*)
Thread
Return to May 1994
- Return to “Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>”
- Return to “Alan Barrett <barrett@daisy.ee.und.ac.za>”
- Return to “Bob Snyder <snyderra@dunx1.ocs.drexel.edu>”
- Return to “Dave Crookes <D.J.Crookes@sheffield.ac.uk>”
- Return to “Jeffrey I. Schiller <jis@mit.edu>”
- Return to “Mark Carter <carterm@spartan.ac.BrockU.CA>”
- Return to “paul@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com (Paul Ferguson)”
- Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>”
- Return to ““Robert A. Hayden” <hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>”
Return to “Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>”
- 1994-05-16 (Mon, 16 May 94 11:04:13 PDT) - PGP 2.5 Beta Release Over, PGP 2.6 to be released next week - Jeffrey I. Schiller <jis@mit.edu>
- 1994-05-16 (Mon, 16 May 94 11:17:39 PDT) - Re: PGP 2.5 Beta Release Over, PGP 2.6 to be released next week - “Robert A. Hayden” <hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
- 1994-05-16 (Mon, 16 May 94 11:33:27 PDT) - Re: PGP 2.5 Beta Release Over, PGP 2.6 to be released next week - Bob Snyder <snyderra@dunx1.ocs.drexel.edu>
- 1994-05-16 (Mon, 16 May 94 11:53:45 PDT) - Re: PGP 2.5 Beta Release Over, PGP 2.6 to be released next week - Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>
- 1994-05-16 (Mon, 16 May 94 11:35:02 PDT) - Re: PGP 2.5 Beta Release Over, PGP 2.6 to be released next week - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
- 1994-05-16 (Mon, 16 May 94 11:50:36 PDT) - Re: PGP 2.5 Beta Release Over, PGP 2.6 to be released next week - paul@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com (Paul Ferguson)
- 1994-05-16 (Mon, 16 May 94 11:56:27 PDT) - Re: PGP 2.5 Beta Release Over, PGP 2.6 to be released next week - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
- 1994-05-16 (Mon, 16 May 94 12:00:53 PDT) - Re: PGP 2.5 Beta Release Over, PGP 2.6 to be released next week - Alan Barrett <barrett@daisy.ee.und.ac.za>
- 1994-05-16 (Mon, 16 May 94 13:43:45 PDT) - Re: PGP 2.5 Beta Release Over, PGP 2.6 to be released next week - Dave Crookes <D.J.Crookes@sheffield.ac.uk>
- 1994-05-17 (Mon, 16 May 94 21:04:38 PDT) - Re: PGP 2.5 Beta Release Over, PGP 2.6 to be released next week - Mark Carter <carterm@spartan.ac.BrockU.CA>