1994-05-12 - Re: PGP 2.5 available from Electronic Frontier Foundation ftp site
Header Data
From: SINCLAIR DOUGLAS N <sinclai@ecf.toronto.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c65206ce4e3c2fffb086f2ed73e63d94668c6dde8a3aad296c9d0ef71aad7aa9
Message ID: <94May12.113316edt.13421@cannon.ecf.toronto.edu>
Reply To: <199405121526.IAA14160@soda.berkeley.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-12 15:33:30 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 12 May 94 08:33:30 PDT
Raw message
From: SINCLAIR DOUGLAS N <sinclai@ecf.toronto.edu>
Date: Thu, 12 May 94 08:33:30 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: PGP 2.5 available from Electronic Frontier Foundation ftp site
In-Reply-To: <199405121526.IAA14160@soda.berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <94May12.113316edt.13421@cannon.ecf.toronto.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> I was under the impression that NAFTA is the reason that Canada is
> included. Am I misinformed? If NAFTA is the reason, isn't Mexico
> equivalent to Canada in this context? Could someone clarify this
> aspect of the export situation, or perhaps point me at a document that
> explains the situation?
>
> Zeke
I believe not. The ITAR regulations have been around for a lot longer
than NAFTA.
I would speculate that it is because the US and Canada have traditionally
exchanged a lot of military technology and hardware, e.g. NORAD.
Thread
Return to May 1994
- Return to “Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>”
- Return to “SINCLAIR DOUGLAS N <sinclai@ecf.toronto.edu>”
Return to “Tommy the Tourist <nobody@soda.berkeley.edu>”
- 1994-05-12 (Thu, 12 May 94 08:26:34 PDT) - Re: PGP 2.5 available from Electronic Frontier Foundation ftp site - Tommy the Tourist <nobody@soda.berkeley.edu>
- 1994-05-12 (Thu, 12 May 94 08:33:30 PDT) - Re: PGP 2.5 available from Electronic Frontier Foundation ftp site - SINCLAIR DOUGLAS N <sinclai@ecf.toronto.edu>
- 1994-05-12 (Thu, 12 May 94 10:02:17 PDT) - Re: PGP 2.5 available from Electronic Frontier Foundation ftp site - Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>