From: gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: df796fa57ecffee3fcfb46023acc8788519f3e60d591194ff28980b46fb68e51
Message ID: <199405142226.XAA08030@an-teallach.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-14 22:26:14 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 14 May 94 15:26:14 PDT
From: gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)
Date: Sat, 14 May 94 15:26:14 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: To anon remailer operators...
Message-ID: <199405142226.XAA08030@an-teallach.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> Perhaps you might block their many addresses, or put general size
> and number of post limits on the remailers.
>
> G
> PS Someone has already used some sort of anon remailer at anon.spies.
> wiretap.com to forge an article apparently *from* C&S to one of the
> porn groups. Anyone know anything about that remailer?
>
: I am in favor of blocking mail to the c+s addresses.
You'll need this:
cslaw@delphi.com
cslaw@win.net
cslaw@witchcraft.com
cslaw@pipeline.com
cslaw@netcom.com
cslaw@indirect.com (currently disabled)
nike@indirect.com (currently disabled)
lcanter@delphi.com
lcanter@win.net
lcanter@witchcraft.com
lcanter@pipeline.com
lcanter@indirect.com (currently disabled)
76636.443@compuserve.com L. Canter
73032.164@compuserve.com M. Siegel
cslaw@lcanter.win.net
cslaw@msiegel.win.net
cslaw@win.net
*@pericles.com (Their own new direct host)
I may have missed some. They pop up *all over* the place :-(
G
Return to May 1994
Return to “Sameer <sameer@soda.berkeley.edu>”