From: Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>
To: m5@vail.tivoli.com
Message Hash: e547747b5f56846d1d3f738136b20e3cd741ce125484ffebe3b51934f27e6775
Message ID: <9405102026.AA16700@netmail2.microsoft.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-10 21:25:16 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 10 May 94 14:25:16 PDT
From: Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 94 14:25:16 PDT
To: m5@vail.tivoli.com
Subject: RE: A CC of my letter to Gelernter@cs.yale.edu
Message-ID: <9405102026.AA16700@netmail2.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: Mike McNally
I don't think an economic argument will really fly well, though I'd
love to be shown to be way wrong. Seems to me that a mass-produced
chip whose production is subsidized by the government would probably
be pretty cheap.
.................................
I think an economic argument may be more of what "they" would be
attentive to, since it is the issue with which they concern themselves
the most - the economic situation of the country, and their need to
be in control of its facade.
A problem: subsidization would mean higher taxes.
Blanc
Return to May 1994
Return to “Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>”
1994-05-10 (Tue, 10 May 94 14:25:16 PDT) - RE: A CC of my letter to Gelernter@cs.yale.edu - Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>