From: smb@research.att.com
To: bshantz@spry.com (Brad Shantz)
Message Hash: e5f800cfaadc784afe7e0641c9557480719548b32d96045a75c9f4f121cfbac9
Message ID: <9405251633.AA15051@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-25 16:33:14 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 25 May 94 09:33:14 PDT
From: smb@research.att.com
Date: Wed, 25 May 94 09:33:14 PDT
To: bshantz@spry.com (Brad Shantz)
Subject: Re: Graph isomorphism based PK cryptosystems?
Message-ID: <9405251633.AA15051@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
So, if JPP publishes it, it would be a matter of trust that he
wouldn't patent it. Okay, I have no problems with that. However,
it is still patentable. What could be done to make it unpatentable?
Nothing. Under current U.S. practice -- and I think non-U.S. as well --
his system is quite patentable. Furthermore, patent applications in
the U.S. are confidential. If jpp wants to patent it, he can. If he
publishes first, he can only patent it in the U.S. If someone else
has invented it first, they can file for a patent, or try to have jpp's
thrown out if he should file. (The U.S., unlike the rest of the world,
has a first-to-invent rule for patents.)
But the one thing that's unconditionally barred is someone else filing
a patent on something jpp invents and publishes.
Return to May 1994
Return to “smb@research.att.com”
1994-05-25 (Wed, 25 May 94 09:33:14 PDT) - Re: Graph isomorphism based PK cryptosystems? - smb@research.att.com