From: Dave Otto (the Wizard of TOTOSoft) <dave@marvin.jta.edd.ca.gov>
To: Carl_Ellison@vos.stratus.com
Message Hash: e6402ec4892060aa8035beec334696bb996c71e0c50a86a4d1c78acb1970a50c
Message ID: <9405041649.AA26453@marvin.jta.edd.ca.gov>
Reply To: <199405041527.LAA03247@transfer.stratus.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-04 16:52:13 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 4 May 94 09:52:13 PDT
From: Dave Otto (the Wizard of TOTOSoft) <dave@marvin.jta.edd.ca.gov>
Date: Wed, 4 May 94 09:52:13 PDT
To: Carl_Ellison@vos.stratus.com
Subject: Re: TLAs, etc.
In-Reply-To: <199405041527.LAA03247@transfer.stratus.com>
Message-ID: <9405041649.AA26453@marvin.jta.edd.ca.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> Jim Miller says:
> >
> > My hypothesis: The TLAs could shut down the cypherpunks mailing list
> > (as it now exists) by dragging all the U.S. list members into court.
> > The TLAs would probably lose the case, but they would still do a lot
> > of damage to the lives of the U.S. list members.
>
> Carl continues with:
> Actually, we might try inviting such prosecution -- e.g., with each of us
> posting source code for some algorithm to the list. This is so clearly
> publication (ala newsletters on paper) that the case would never hold but
> it wouldn't hurt to have a court rule.
Perhaps by being more charitable to non-hardcore crypto discussions (Perry),
the list could attract more members. Large groups are much more difficult
to prosecute (persecute) than small ones (yes I know, it's not how big it
is, it's how you use it). Personally, I find the social dynamics on this
list *HIGHLY* entertaining and quite informative.
dave
Return to May 1994
Return to “habs@warwick.com (Harry S. Hawk)”