1994-05-14 - Re: To anon remailer operators…

Header Data

From: Sameer <sameer@soda.berkeley.edu>
To: gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)
Message Hash: ec8e5bf37d5e8377f9d1be81dd1ea9d763dc56694fd80f5f7436c658135d25c5
Message ID: <199405142200.PAA18293@soda.berkeley.edu>
Reply To: <199405142153.WAA06896@an-teallach.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-14 22:01:07 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 14 May 94 15:01:07 PDT

Raw message

From: Sameer <sameer@soda.berkeley.edu>
Date: Sat, 14 May 94 15:01:07 PDT
To: gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)
Subject: Re: To anon remailer operators...
In-Reply-To: <199405142153.WAA06896@an-teallach.com>
Message-ID: <199405142200.PAA18293@soda.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


> 
> Perhaps you might block their many addresses, or put general size
> and number of post limits on the remailers.
> 
> G
> PS Someone has already used some sort of anon remailer at anon.spies.
> wiretap.com to forge an article apparently *from* C&S to one of the
> porn groups.  Anyone know anything about that remailer?
> 

	I am in favor of blocking mail to the c+s addresses.

Thread

• Return to May 1994

• Return to “gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)”
• Return to ““Robert A. Hayden” <hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>”

• Return to “Sameer <sameer@soda.berkeley.edu>”

• 1994-05-14 (Sat, 14 May 94 14:54:13 PDT) - To anon remailer operators… - gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)
  • 1994-05-14 (Sat, 14 May 94 15:01:07 PDT) - Re: To anon remailer operators… - Sameer <sameer@soda.berkeley.edu>
    • 1994-05-14 (Sat, 14 May 94 15:26:47 PDT) - Re: To anon remailer operators… - “Robert A. Hayden” <hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>