1994-05-28 - Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?
Header Data
From: f_griffith@ccsvax.sfasu.edu
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f76b7b61b921a698b3ed844a35e102483ba037487785f3a4decd4ef99c5f8254
Message ID: <9405281604.AA09140@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-28 16:04:45 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 28 May 94 09:04:45 PDT
Raw message
From: f_griffith@ccsvax.sfasu.edu
Date: Sat, 28 May 94 09:04:45 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?
Message-ID: <9405281604.AA09140@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>meanwhile provide a simple, patched version of 2.3 for all platforms that
>both offers fully-2.6-compatible ciphertext and 2.6-impersonating keys.
>
> dave
>
Wouldn't it be better to have a patched version of 2.5? Wouldn't
this remove the questions about legal use in the U.S.?
Thread
Return to May 1994
Return to “f_griffith@ccsvax.sfasu.edu”
1994-05-28 (Sat, 28 May 94 09:04:45 PDT) - Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ? - f_griffith@ccsvax.sfasu.edu