From: Conrad Hughes <chughes@maths.tcd.ie>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f8c457565b39bac43c1eee13520f6f212d3f388f44f56dc83f9c67e67de23a62
Message ID: <9405252335.aa01336@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-25 22:35:46 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 25 May 94 15:35:46 PDT
From: Conrad Hughes <chughes@maths.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 25 May 94 15:35:46 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?
Message-ID: <9405252335.aa01336@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Russell Nelson writes:
[quoting someone:]
> I asked Jim Bidzos about this last year. He told me they're planning
> on becoming a supplier of cryptography code and expertise.
>If they had expertise, they wouldn't need patents.
Come on - fine, I don't like that patent (not that it affects me very
badly), but where do you think they got the name RSADSI from?
Conrad
Return to May 1994
Return to “Conrad Hughes <chughes@maths.tcd.ie>”
1994-05-25 (Wed, 25 May 94 15:35:46 PDT) - Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ? - Conrad Hughes <chughes@maths.tcd.ie>