From: Ed Carp <ecarp@netcom.com>
To: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Message Hash: fbd9031eae2d870d4c5c4cc08dd4cafddfa5216e36df4cc9248fac0ba5db9e19
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9405020947.A28464-0100000@netcom10>
Reply To: <199405021356.AA14925@panix.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-02 16:05:22 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 2 May 94 09:05:22 PDT
From: Ed Carp <ecarp@netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 2 May 94 09:05:22 PDT
To: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Subject: Re: Security Consult. Needed
In-Reply-To: <199405021356.AA14925@panix.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9405020947.A28464-0100000@netcom10>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Mon, 2 May 1994, Duncan Frissell wrote:
> Two recent incidents in NYC show massive market failure in the
> information security industry.
You mean, marketing PGP to criminals?
> One of the city's largest bookies was busted when the Feds intercepted the
> daily fax transmissions summarizing business results sent from his NY
> office to his Florida home.
>
> A major cocaine dealer is facing prosecution based on written transaction
> records seized at his office. His simple code was broken by a "known
> plaintext attack" when investigators were able to match his written
> notations with transaction information derived from wiretaps.
>
> Can't anyone help these people? Maybe 178th Street needs PGP and Secure
> Drive more than the PC Expo.
Be careful with this line of reasoning. If you market PGP to a crook for
the explicit purpose of keeping his illegal activities hidden from the
cops, you violate at least two different laws. It's like selling lock
picks to a known burglar. You could be prosecuted for conspiracy, aiding
and abetting, and whatever they call interference with a police
investigation nowadays.
Return to May 1994
Return to “Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>”