1994-05-17 - PGP 2.5 problems?
Header Data
From: dat@ebt.com (David Taffs)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: fdb7774677d34b5be8b8af9ca2a4a9aa91a5a4f37a34461e4348733e56433231
Message ID: <9405171651.AA13903@helpmann.ebt.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-17 16:52:14 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 17 May 94 09:52:14 PDT
Raw message
From: dat@ebt.com (David Taffs)
Date: Tue, 17 May 94 09:52:14 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: PGP 2.5 problems?
Message-ID: <9405171651.AA13903@helpmann.ebt.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
So what are the problems with PGP 2.5? If this is legal in the USA
(& CA), and interoperates with 2.3(a) and 2.4, what's the problem?
Doesn't that satisfy short-term needs adequately?
It seems to me that if PGP 2.5 is any good, PKP might have blundered
mightily by allowing MIT to release it to the world at large, and are
now trying to "rectify" the problem by burying it as best they can.
So, again, what are the problems with PGP 2.5, if any?
--
dat@ebt.com (David Taffs)
Thread
Return to May 1994
- Return to “dat@ebt.com (David Taffs)”
Return to ““Robert A. Hayden” <hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>”
- 1994-05-17 (Tue, 17 May 94 09:52:14 PDT) - PGP 2.5 problems? - dat@ebt.com (David Taffs)
- 1994-05-17 (Tue, 17 May 94 10:09:11 PDT) - Re: PGP 2.5 problems? - “Robert A. Hayden” <hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>