From: firstname.lastname@example.org (John K. Taber)
Message Hash: 108349e63824db42e5f56d33885bd7ab4e6458f515486ea6c4f32f66a5eb12ab
Message ID: <199406062329.SAA19494@netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-06-06 23:29:15 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 6 Jun 94 16:29:15 PDT
From: email@example.com (John K. Taber) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 94 16:29:15 PDT To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: Sternlight & PGP Message-ID: <199406062329.SAA19494@netcom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain I would like clarification on Sternlight's contention that PGP violates RSA's patents. My understanding is that PGP < 2.4 does not so long as its use was private and non-commercial. In other words, isn't the patent issue a fabrication of Sternlight to attack PGP? Or did he really have a point?