1994-06-10 - Re: Remailer Chaining Security?
Header Data
From: “Rev. B. Sanders” <popetwo@interaccess.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 29bfd9106460ea4f22cc87163b61fb0ec74d8ea784a1460b0690a12f45f8a2d9
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9406100619.A4621-0100000@flowbee.interaccess.com>
Reply To: <9406100847.AA20331@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-06-10 11:54:38 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 10 Jun 94 04:54:38 PDT
Raw message
From: "Rev. B. Sanders" <popetwo@interaccess.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 94 04:54:38 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Remailer Chaining Security?
In-Reply-To: <9406100847.AA20331@toad.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9406100619.A4621-0100000@flowbee.interaccess.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
But how does one go about chaining through the remailers? I tried this
and the message got lost. If indeed you can, does it just involve using
more than one (anon-to) line in the header?
__________________________________________________________________
Rev. St. Pope Two of the Attachment | Finger me for PGP Public Key
(Secret Masters of Godzilla) | Pope Two CofA CHILhq
HAIL ERIS! ALL HAIL DISCORDIA! | popetwo@interaccess.com
__________________________________________________________________
Thread
Return to June 1994
- Return to “ghio@cmu.edu (Matthew Ghio)”
Return to ““Rev. B. Sanders” <popetwo@interaccess.com>”
- 1994-06-10 (Fri, 10 Jun 94 01:49:48 PDT) - Re: Remailer Chaining Security? - ghio@cmu.edu (Matthew Ghio)
- 1994-06-10 (Fri, 10 Jun 94 04:54:38 PDT) - Re: Remailer Chaining Security? - “Rev. B. Sanders” <popetwo@interaccess.com>