From: smb@research.att.com
To: pfarrell@netcom.com (Pat Farrell)
Message Hash: 2d7608f53872f399bcd31f22bbb9ba222478a34aacde6138ad48d73a4fe808bd
Message ID: <9406191335.AA24696@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-06-19 13:35:46 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 19 Jun 94 06:35:46 PDT
From: smb@research.att.com
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 94 06:35:46 PDT
To: pfarrell@netcom.com (Pat Farrell)
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <9406191335.AA24696@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
There are a few things to watch out for. First, it's really easy
for subtle (or not so subtle) biases to be present in a noise source.
These can be due to component drift, external noise (i.e., power
supply coupling), etc. You want a design that isn't sensitive to
such things, if possible. Second -- and it's partly a corollary to
the first -- the designs I've seen for real RNGs have always included
a scrambler step, to mix up the bits, account for biases, etc.
The first such scrambler was, I think, described by von Neuman himself.
I have the citation in my office; I'll try to post it tomorrow.
Return to June 1994
Return to “smb@research.att.com”
1994-06-19 (Sun, 19 Jun 94 06:35:46 PDT) - No Subject - smb@research.att.com