1994-06-03 - Re: more info from talk at MIT yesterday.

Header Data

From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com (bill.stewart@pleasantonca.ncr.com +1-510-484-6204)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 309bf421a24ea9efe0a771f230618c9a5d8540f325520b09bdcdcd760309bfe1
Message ID: <9406031601.AA22878@anchor.ho.att.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-06-03 16:02:51 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 3 Jun 94 09:02:51 PDT

Raw message

From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com (bill.stewart@pleasantonca.ncr.com +1-510-484-6204)
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 94 09:02:51 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: more info from talk at MIT yesterday.
Message-ID: <9406031601.AA22878@anchor.ho.att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> Bill Sommerfeld says:
> > They also had a comment that they considered Blaze's findings to be
> > mostly irrelevant, as the only people who would use it would be
> > persons who *didn't* trust the escrow system, but *did* trust the
> > algorithm...

Defense Messaging System is supposedly going to use Skipjack,
so I assume it's reasonably secure - and if there *are*
NSA-only backdoors in the algorithm, at least they won't
be admitting it to your neighbor hood cops and FBI wiretappers,
so you'd have to be an *interesting* suspect to get cracked.

		Bill
		





Thread