1994-06-17 - Re: swipe working on infinity.c2.org
Header Data
From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
To: Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>
Message Hash: 3bf74a26a5a11f0b9f6a23adb7c27f05338f0a9e7f65e8c8604ac0eec1024b3b
Message ID: <9406171916.AA02729@snark.imsi.com>
Reply To: <199406171902.MAA26914@servo.qualcomm.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-06-17 19:16:37 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 17 Jun 94 12:16:37 PDT
Raw message
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 94 12:16:37 PDT
To: Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: swipe working on infinity.c2.org
In-Reply-To: <199406171902.MAA26914@servo.qualcomm.com>
Message-ID: <9406171916.AA02729@snark.imsi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Phil Karn says:
> These are all advantages of IP-level encryption over doing it above
> TCP. The main disadvantage is overhead -- Van Jacobsen TCP/IP header
> compression breaks.
Of course, one could simply compress the encapsulated packets -- after
all, in some sense any pair of hosts running swIPe between them have
produced an odd sort of point to point link between them.
Perry
Thread
Return to June 1994
- Return to “Jef Poskanzer <jef@ee.lbl.gov>”
- Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>”
Return to “Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>”
- 1994-06-17 (Fri, 17 Jun 94 08:24:33 PDT) - Re: swipe working on infinity.c2.org - Jef Poskanzer <jef@ee.lbl.gov>
- 1994-06-17 (Fri, 17 Jun 94 08:38:13 PDT) - Re: swipe working on infinity.c2.org - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
- 1994-06-17 (Fri, 17 Jun 94 12:03:16 PDT) - Re: swipe working on infinity.c2.org - Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>
- 1994-06-17 (Fri, 17 Jun 94 12:16:37 PDT) - Re: swipe working on infinity.c2.org - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>