1994-06-07 - Re: REMAILERS: standard xx-To: line

Header Data

From: ghio@cmu.edu (Matthew Ghio)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 473af21f876a29fc12faeca18fc9378068bdec39ba8c6834c5e005f9eec0878b
Message ID: <9406070433.AA20262@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-06-07 04:34:27 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 6 Jun 94 21:34:27 PDT

Raw message

From: ghio@cmu.edu (Matthew Ghio)
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 94 21:34:27 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: REMAILERS: standard xx-To: line
Message-ID: <9406070433.AA20262@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>cp's,
>matt just mentioned that remailer@soda doesn't accept "Request-Remailing-To"
>header lines (which explains why i thought it was dead) and i note that not
>all other remailers accept "Anon-Send-To:".  anarchy has it's place in
>our lives but, it would be nice to cut down on sode come in remailing and
>ping scripts.  the three close to standard headers seem to be
>"Anon-Send-To:", "Request-Remailing-To:", and "X-Anon-To:".  it would be
>more convenient :) for all remailers to either allow all three or settle
>on one standard (nfl).

My remailer (ghio@kaiwan.com) supports all three, and also Anon-To.

All of the remailers support Request-Remailing-To, except soda.

I'm not completely sure which support Anon-To and which use X-Anon-To.
Soda.berkeley.edu is the only one which requires Anon-Send-To.





Thread