1994-06-03 - Re: more info from talk at MIT yesterday.

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
To: smb@research.att.com
Message Hash: 4f4d3434b08b67811640afe64e5dca22a1d932b18c2a4eb1071eab8f94ce0c13
Message ID: <9406031516.AA04246@snark.imsi.com>
Reply To: <199406031507.LAA19328@wintermute.imsi.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-06-03 15:16:35 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 3 Jun 94 08:16:35 PDT

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 94 08:16:35 PDT
To: smb@research.att.com
Subject: Re: more info from talk at MIT yesterday.
In-Reply-To: <199406031507.LAA19328@wintermute.imsi.com>
Message-ID: <9406031516.AA04246@snark.imsi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



smb@research.att.com says:
> Why can't they refuse to license a patent?

I was under the impression that the law obligated you to license
patents -- albeit not necessarily at an attractive price. I am quite
likely to be mistaken on this -- my memory on the topic is very
sketchy, as demonstrated by the fact that I didn't realize the
government can patent things (although I was right on copyrights.)

Perry





Thread