From: Vance Cochrane (B.E.S.T.) <i-vancec@microsoft.com>
To: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 59ee5cdedaa14096a539eca8df9fecb8771528e35c2e80933fbd243c7ca3282e
Message ID: <9406062001.AA06676@netmail2.microsoft.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-06-06 21:00:03 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 6 Jun 94 14:00:03 PDT
From: Vance Cochrane (B.E.S.T.) <i-vancec@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 94 14:00:03 PDT
To: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Why it is legal to export PGP under ITAR
Message-ID: <9406062001.AA06676@netmail2.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
| >I am not a lawyer so don't scorch me...
| >Where does one obtain a legal definition if it is not in Blacks Law
Dictionary?
|
| >From relevant court decisions. Black's Legal Dictionary is a useful
| reference tool, but has absolutely no weight of authority whatsoever.
|
| >Isn't the next source a "regular" dictionary?
|
| Not in this instance.
|
| >...thats what they do on Perry Mason ;-)
|
| Don't take legal advice from mediocre actors.
But its ok if they are good actors, right? <:-/
Return to June 1994
Return to “Vance Cochrane (B.E.S.T.) <i-vancec@microsoft.com>”
1994-06-06 (Mon, 6 Jun 94 14:00:03 PDT) - Re: Why it is legal to export PGP under ITAR - Vance Cochrane (B.E.S.T.) <i-vancec@microsoft.com>