From: Jim choate <ravage@bga.com>
To: ecarp@netcom.com
Message Hash: 5e0c92c96175b9dde5e9485e533745198ff5e31659f611afd71604c43f6e8952
Message ID: <199406221812.NAA21717@zoom.bga.com>
Reply To: <m0qGL7W-0004EcC@khijol.uucp>
UTC Datetime: 1994-06-22 18:13:23 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 22 Jun 94 11:13:23 PDT
From: Jim choate <ravage@bga.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 94 11:13:23 PDT
To: ecarp@netcom.com
Subject: Re: your mail
In-Reply-To: <m0qGL7W-0004EcC@khijol.uucp>
Message-ID: <199406221812.NAA21717@zoom.bga.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
>
> > An even better idea: disconnect the antenna. Most of the noise comes
> > from the front end amplifier, not the galactic and cosmic background,
> > at least in your average consumer grade receiver. And this is a quantum
> > process that someone else definitely can't predict or copy.
>
This is a bad idea, the computer it self will generate clocking noise which
will appear in the noise and destroy the randomness. The standard, and even
most high-end, recievers don't have the shielding to prevent this sort of
intrussion. Heck, that digital clock on your desk (and possibly your wrist if
close enough) will cause problems as well.
> And if that doesn't work, crawl up the spectrum a bit. The higher in
> frequency you go, the more thermal noise you'll see.
>
Only up to a point. Past a certain point and the processes will start to
roll off their energy production.
Return to June 1994
Return to “Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>”