1994-06-06 - REMAILERS: standard xx-To: line

Header Data

From: steve willey <willey@bach.seattleu.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 63a026e3497d93f42847573bb22be243785c3f922430cd054e6bfacf6cd09a87
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9406061359.C18573-0100000@oliver.seattleu.edu>
Reply To: <9406061917.AA10779@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-06-06 20:18:26 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 6 Jun 94 13:18:26 PDT

Raw message

From: steve willey <willey@bach.seattleu.edu>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 94 13:18:26 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: REMAILERS: standard xx-To: line
In-Reply-To: <9406061917.AA10779@toad.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9406061359.C18573-0100000@oliver.seattleu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


cp's,
matt just mentioned that remailer@soda doesn't accept "Request-Remailing-To" 
header lines (which explains why i thought it was dead) and i note that not 
all other remailers accept "Anon-Send-To:".  anarchy has it's place in 
our lives but, it would be nice to cut down on sode come in remailing and 
ping scripts.  the three close to standard headers seem to be 
"Anon-Send-To:", "Request-Remailing-To:", and "X-Anon-To:".  it would be 
more convenient :) for all remailers to either allow all three or settle 
on one standard (nfl).

thanks,
steve

------
** stephen willey  DoD# 0769, 1Kspt=5.80, prez IBMC    *   '92 CFM-2    **
** willey@seattleu.edu      pgp key on server          *   '81 GS450    **
**   "The tree of liberty must from time to time be    *   '73 RD350    **
**    refreshed by the blood of patriots and tyrants."  t. jefferson    **






Thread