From: koontzd@lrcs.loral.com (David Koontz )
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 725796c6e059b6dbb05eb32e0c6eafebbfa147eb1fa101da48cba2820516865e
Message ID: <9406030000.AA18711@io.lrcs.loral.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-06-03 00:00:49 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 2 Jun 94 17:00:49 PDT
From: koontzd@lrcs.loral.com (David Koontz )
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 94 17:00:49 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Spoofing Clipper
Message-ID: <9406030000.AA18711@io.lrcs.loral.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>With enough of these traversing the ether, the chaff/wheat noise ratio
>goes down to where having a source identifier (ID in the LEAF) gets
>real hit or miss - to where it loses traffic analysis value. Sort of
>growing weeds intentionally on the information superhighway.
If the adversary learns to distinguish false clipper transmissions, you
could always use a fake one to lull him into not listening further.
Return to June 1994
Return to “koontzd@lrcs.loral.com (David Koontz )”
1994-06-03 (Thu, 2 Jun 94 17:00:49 PDT) - Re: Spoofing Clipper - koontzd@lrcs.loral.com (David Koontz )