From: smb@research.att.com
To: Richard.Johnson@Colorado.EDU
Message Hash: 82888c2c09218a6a506fa5da850d3ecc1bd6f3378df99549ad4f5792435526c6
Message ID: <9406191739.AA28649@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-06-19 17:39:25 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 19 Jun 94 10:39:25 PDT
From: smb@research.att.com
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 94 10:39:25 PDT
To: Richard.Johnson@Colorado.EDU
Subject: Re: Hardware generators was: your mail
Message-ID: <9406191739.AA28649@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
How about a SCSI device instead. Most UNIX boxes and Macs
nowadays have a few unused SCSI IDs. The great majority of
DOS machines with SCSI (all those new ones with CD-ROMs, etc.)
have unused SCSI IDs. SCSI has the advantage of being rather
fast, and is a cross-platform solution.
``Cross-platform'' is great, but ``fast'' is probably a bad idea.
Few random number generators are particularly fast, and if you sample
the input too rapidly, you're likely to get too high a correlation
between successive bits.
Return to June 1994
Return to “smb@research.att.com”
1994-06-19 (Sun, 19 Jun 94 10:39:25 PDT) - Re: Hardware generators was: your mail - smb@research.att.com