From: rishab@dxm.ernet.in
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 82892a80549517ab1a41dbdf3b05abe4dd4c55401d2ffefb079ae046510c6999
Message ID: <gate.RPLBNc1w165w@dxm.ernet.in>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-06-03 02:48:34 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 2 Jun 94 19:48:34 PDT
From: rishab@dxm.ernet.in
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 94 19:48:34 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: BBS anonymity policy
Message-ID: <gate.RPLBNc1w165w@dxm.ernet.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Pierre@eworld.com:
> I thought this might interest people... eWorld's "policy" on anonymity...
Commercial net providers or BBSes usually don't bother much about anonymity.
A user may want anonymity on a BBS for three reasons:
1. to avoid harassment, or avoid situations like Unicorn's where the
'outside world' gets to know your electronic views
2. to avoid being included in statistics - though most BBSes need statistics
for charging or whatever
3. to do something either illegal, or provocative to legal action, such as
tmp's. BBS providers are unlikely to condone or want to protect such
users.
A simple way to provide anonymity for (1) is used by a BBS I'm co-sysop of.
Everyone's identity is scrupulously recorded, for billing purposes. Users can
create any number of identities for the purposes of posting or receiving mail,
and no corelation between these pseudonyms and real ones is available to other
users. For administration purposes, all pseudonyms for real names are available
to sysops.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rishab Aiyer Ghosh rishab@dxm.ernet.in
Voicemail +91 11 3760335; Vox/Fax/Data 6853410
H-34C Saket New Delhi 110017 INDIA
The National Fairness to Game Animals Association says:
Support your right to arm bears!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return to June 1994
Return to “rishab@dxm.ernet.in”
1994-06-03 (Thu, 2 Jun 94 19:48:34 PDT) - BBS anonymity policy - rishab@dxm.ernet.in