From: norm@netcom.com (Norman Hardy)
To: “Ed Carp [SysAdmin]” <khijol!erc>, cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 91e50223414707fb2fac1a746ed2f8f5b2e0b6c9b4d97e989d0e1829d95cef23
Message ID: <199406060001.RAA12531@netcom.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-06-06 00:01:15 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 5 Jun 94 17:01:15 PDT
From: norm@netcom.com (Norman Hardy)
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 94 17:01:15 PDT
To: "Ed Carp [SysAdmin]" <khijol!erc>, cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: The Illogic of Clipper
Message-ID: <199406060001.RAA12531@netcom.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 15:27 6/5/94 +0100, Ed Carp [SysAdmin] wrote:
>I'm sorry, but I just don't understand the government's position on
>Clipper. After all, the best way for people to ensure that the
>government's not going to listen in on their communications is to not use
>Clipper. Now, unless it was a crime to use anything other than Clipper,
>the government couldn't do a thing about it.
I think that NSA, FBI & CIA hope that Clipper will become a de facto
standard resulting from its being required for certain kinds of
interactions with government agencies. If this were to happen non-clipper
products would have a more difficult time attaining a critical mass. The
real purpose of Clipper can thus be stated as an attempt to prevent the
success of some de facto standard that the government could not tap. I
recall hearing someone from NSA say something very much like this.
...
Return to June 1994
Return to “norm@netcom.com (Norman Hardy)”
1994-06-06 (Sun, 5 Jun 94 17:01:15 PDT) - Re: The Illogic of Clipper - norm@netcom.com (Norman Hardy)