1994-06-22 - Re: e$: Geodesic Securities Markets

Header Data

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
To: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
Message Hash: ce0a78628c3c77ca4a26cf66d9113e35edc9e1779efd492976ec079025a47350
Message ID: <Pine.3.87.9406221348.A4736-0100000@crl.crl.com>
Reply To: <199406221733.NAA29157@zork.tiac.net>
UTC Datetime: 1994-06-22 20:29:38 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 22 Jun 94 13:29:38 PDT

Raw message

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 94 13:29:38 PDT
To: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
Subject: Re: e$: Geodesic Securities Markets
In-Reply-To: <199406221733.NAA29157@zork.tiac.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.87.9406221348.A4736-0100000@crl.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


C'punks,

On Wed, 22 Jun 1994, Robert Hettinga wrote:

> . . . physical delivery is becoming more and more
> obsolete. That makes sense. Once a certificate is put into the vault at
> DTC, it usually never leaves.  It might as well not be there at all.
> Changes in ownership are reflected by offseting book entries. Ah, the
> wonders of double-entry bookeeping.
> 
> Oddly enough, an e$ certification scheme reverses that paradigm. The book
> entries disapear, the certificates proliferate, and the clearinghouse
> becomes a referee, "blessing" the trade.

I don't think so.  The book entries still exist.  The book is the only 
place securities ever really exist.  E$ certificates--and even physical 
certificates--are nothing more than receipts evidencing ownership as 
defined by the book entry.  Remember, securities are "intangible" assets 
by definition.  (Ditto for dollars, yen, pounds and francs, by the way.)


 S a n d y








Thread